Archive for August, 2012
I knew my comments wouldn’t be posted, so I’ll post them below.
Today The Advocate published – uncritically- a glowing excerpt from a book written by a woman who diagnosed her daughter as transgender at the age of eighteen months. The author and parent, Tracie Stratton, describes being disturbed by her tiny infants lack of conformity to socially proscribed sexist feminine gender behaviors for infants.
She diagnosed her daughter as “boyish” and “different” at one year of age.
Hey guess what folks. People should not be examining one year olds for sex role compliance. No matter your politics, your religion, your horrific sexism, your munchausen’s syndrome by proxy, no one should be monitoring a one year old child for sex-role compliance.
But Stratton did. So much though that she claims that before two years of age her daughter was already parotting back to mom: “Me a boy, mama”.
“By eighteen months I knew that this child, my…
View original post 1,592 more words
Jigsaw doll from “Saw”
The radical feminist that haunt the internet, are all about how “other people look”, yet if you critique their looks, ooh, you’re a misogynist woman hater! So, as Jigsaw from the Saw movies says “I want to play a game”. This game is similar to the “Paddy Power” advert shown and banned recently, but whereas that was trying to promote a betting company, this isn’t. So without further ado, out of the below list, see if you can tell who is female, male or trans (mtf or ftm to keep it simple). Answers when I close the posting, and some extra restrictions on approval of posts than normal, but only till the posting is closed ( or the quiz I should say ).
Please answer in the style of “1 = male”<enter>”2=female”<enter>”3 = trans” etc. any other comments, please put in a seperate post after for approval later (it’ll make sense then).
Photos are here – please only post your comments on this WordPress blog, and not the Flickr page
I’m reblogging this because any comments I make won’t be approved.
Better watch this one quick. This 2009 video archive of the 16×9 news program featuring the John Fulton case was only uploaded yesterday but trans are already trying to censor it and prevent it from being viewed- by reporting it to YouTube as “promoting hatred and violence” (!) :
Fulton was the owner of an Ontario women-only gym (which had only one open shower and change area) who was dragged before the Ontario Human Rights Commission three years ago by man with a penis, Lisa MacDonald- who insisted it was his human right to parade his dick into the open women’s shower. Fulton lost tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees before MacDonald suddenly dropped his complaint. Since the Commission could not rule on the withdrawn complaint, Fulton had no resolution and…
View original post 950 more words
The majority of us have an inner sense of right and wrong, whether that comes from religion, society, our parents or elsewhere. I know that if I steal something and get caught, I can expect to be punished. So why is it, that some people ie Cathy Brennan, think they can habitually breach the terms of service agreeements (that we have all lied about saying said we’ve read and clicked that we accept them anyway) and not face any sanctions?
Cathy Brennan recently had her Tumblr account suspended, and it seems now, deleted, possibly after the complaints of some she targeted on her blog who she thought was disgusting (so that narrows that list down by a lot). Regardless of what the person she wrote about had on their website, CB went on to write all kinds of things about this person whether they we’re true or not I don’t know, but mud sticks. She essentially went on a witch-hunt, and then acts like the victim, when her account is suspended and deleted for breaching the TOS and this woman is a lawyer too! She knows or should know what is and isn’t acceptable behaviour, but still, she huffs and puffs and expects all to bow down to her radical feminist view of the world.
Well Cathy, you break the rules, you get caught, you get punished. What about that do you find objectionable?
I’ve been banned from posting here it seems, my reply will be in the comments section.
there is a special place in hell for writers who utilize the false equivalence when writing about radical feminists versus misogynists. you writers know who you are — dont you? for readers who need examples, try here and here.
its not just the intellectual laziness or even outright lying of the false equivalence generally that sticks in my craw, although those things are like sandpaper on my brain because they are, well, intellectually lazy. and lies. for real writers and thinkers, these things are the scene of a crime. coming across one or the other while reading someone elses (or even your own — oops!) work is like stumbling upon a crime scene. its a crime against writing and thinking. i cannot overstate how violently criminal this is, like mens poetry which uses letters and words to obscure various truths, and to contort and obfuscate information rather than convey it.
View original post 826 more words